FEA Simulation — LS-3: Shear Load in X (Governing Case)

Figure 1: Equivalent (Von-Mises) Stress — LS-3: 86 kN Shear Load in Global X-Direction | Max: 232.96 MPa
0–43
Minimum
43–172
Low Stress
172–233
Moderate (Max: 232.96)
< 345 MPa
Below Yield — Safe

Material Properties & Load Steps

Load StepApplied LoadMax von Mises Stress (MPa)Assessment
LS-1: Pin Preload2 kN bolt pretension49.287Below Yield
LS-2: Shear Load in Y86 kN, global Y-direction209.420Below Yield
LS-3: Shear Load in X86 kN, global X-direction232.960Below Yield
LS-4: Manual Locking Force250 N at handle125.930Below Yield
LS-5: Torsional Moment194 N·m about pin axis49.024Below Yield
MaterialASTM A572 Grade 50 Steel
Density7850 kg/m³
Young's Modulus200 GPa
Poisson's Ratio0.30
Yield Strength345 MPa
Ultimate Tensile Strength450–620 MPa
Friction Coefficient (Pin Interface)0.15
Pin Radius15 mm

Executive Summary

This case study presents a static structural Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of the lock pin assembly for a 35-ton tipper truck. The lock pin prevents the auxiliary frame from lifting away from the chassis while the tipper body is at its 30° tipping angle, resting on 8 lock pin assemblies.

A conservative design load of 86 kN was derived from the rated 35-ton payload (343,350 N), distributed over 8 pins (≈43 kN per pin) and factored by a dynamic factor of 2 for unloading operation. The assembly was evaluated across five load steps — pin preload, shear in Y, shear in X, manual locking force, and torsional moment — using ASTM A572 Grade 50 steel (yield strength 345 MPa). The analysis was carried out for Insight Design Consultant, with structural analysis performed by Santanu and Team and drawings prepared by Sumit Gorai.

Overall Performance Rating
8.7 / 10 — Structurally Adequate

Study Objectives

The FEA study was conducted with the following primary objectives:

Evaluate the structural integrity of the lock pin assembly under the worst-case unloading condition
Derive a conservative worst-case design load from the rated 35-ton payload distributed across 8 pins
Evaluate equivalent von-Mises stress across five independent load steps
Verify all load cases remain below the ASTM A572 Grade 50 yield strength (345 MPa)
Establish friction torque acting on the pin due to the reaction force at the locking interface
Confirm boundary conditions and contact definitions reflect realistic assembly behaviour

FEA Simulation Observations

1

Pin Preload — LS-1

A 2 kN bolt pretension applied to simulate assembly preload and eliminate initial clearance produces a maximum von-Mises stress of only 49.287 MPa — well below the 345 MPa yield strength.

Pass
2

Shear Load in Y — LS-2

An 86 kN shear load applied in the global Y-direction produces a maximum von-Mises stress of 209.420 MPa, remaining comfortably below the material yield strength.

Pass
3

Shear Load in X — LS-3 (Governing Case)

An 86 kN shear load applied in the global X-direction produces the highest stress recorded across all load steps: 232.960 MPa. This remains below the 345 MPa yield limit but represents the governing (least-margin) load case for the assembly.

Governing Case
4

Manual Locking Force — LS-4

A 250 N force applied at the operating handle to simulate manual engagement produces a maximum von-Mises stress of 125.930 MPa, well within the elastic region.

Pass
5

Torsional Moment — LS-5

A 194 N·m torque applied about the lock pin axis, derived from the friction relation T = μFr at the 86 kN reaction force, produces a maximum von-Mises stress of 49.024 MPa, confirming adequate torsional capacity.

Pass

Load Case Stress Plots

LS-1: Pin Preload — 2 kN bolt pretension applied to simulate assembly preload.

LS-2: Shear Load in Y — 86 kN applied in global Y-direction.

LS-4: Manual Locking Force — 250 N applied at handle.

LS-5: Torsional Moment — 194 N·m applied about the lock pin axis.

Stress Profile by Load Step (vs. 345 MPa Yield)

Maximum equivalent (von-Mises) stress recorded for each load step, referenced against the ASTM A572 Grade 50 yield strength of 345 MPa.

LS-1: Pin Preload
49.287 MPa 14% of yield — ample margin
LS-2: Shear Load in Y
209.420 MPa 61% of yield
LS-3: Shear Load in X
232.960 MPa Governing case — 68% of yield
LS-4: Manual Locking Force
125.930 MPa 36% of yield
LS-5: Torsional Moment
49.024 MPa 14% of yield — ample margin

Performance Evaluation Matrix

LS-1: Pin Preload Response
Excellent
9.5 / 10
LS-2: Shear Y Response
Good Margin
8.5 / 10
LS-3: Shear X Response (Governing)
Adequate — Monitor
7.5 / 10
LS-4: Manual Locking Response
Excellent
9.0 / 10
LS-5: Torsional Response
Excellent
9.5 / 10
Design Load Basis (86 kN)
Conservative & Justified
9.0 / 10
Boundary Conditions & Contacts
Realistic
8.5 / 10
Overall Structural Adequacy
Adequate — No Yielding
8.7 / 10
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING — Structurally Adequate 8.7 / 10

Design Load Basis & Derivation

The 86 kN design load applied to the lock pin assembly was derived through the following conservative design basis, rather than being applied as the full 35-ton payload directly on a single pin:

Step Basis Result
Total Weight35,000 kg × 9.81 m/s²343,350 N
Load DistributionTotal load / 8 lock pins≈ 42,918 N (43 kN) per pin
Dynamic Factor43 kN × 2 (unloading dynamics)≈ 86 kN per pin
Selected Design LoadConservative worst-case reaction86 kN (design assumption)
Friction TorqueT = μFr = 0.15 × 86,000 N × 0.015 m193.5 N·m ≈ 194 N·m

Boundary Conditions

Fixed support applied to the mounting plate surfaces attached to the auxiliary frame
Frictional contacts defined between the lock pin and mating components
Bonded contacts used for welded or rigidly connected parts
Large deflection and nonlinear contact behaviour considered where applicable

Engineering Recommendations

Maintain Separation of External Load and Torsional Load Cases

The 194 N·m torque is derived from the same 86 kN contact force through the friction relation (T = μFr). Applying both simultaneously in a single load case would effectively count the same loading effect twice.

  • Use the 86 kN external load independently for standard structural strength assessment
  • Reserve the 194 N·m torque for a separate analysis of the locking/unlocking mechanism under friction

Confirm Load Resolution When Applying Combined X-Y Loads

If 86 kN is applied simultaneously in both X and Y directions, the resultant load equals 121.6 kN. For an intended worst-case load of 86 kN total, resolve the load into its X and Y components rather than applying the full value in both directions.

Periodic Inspection at Governing Load Location

As LS-3 (86 kN shear in X) is the governing load case at 232.96 MPa, include this location in routine inspection schedules to monitor for wear, fatigue, or fastener loosening over the service life of the assembly.

Maintain 2 kN Preload During Assembly

Ensure the specified 2 kN bolt pretension is achieved and verified during assembly and periodic maintenance, as this preload eliminates initial clearance and contributes to the stable, low-stress response observed in LS-1.

Conclusion

The maximum equivalent stress obtained among all loading cases was 232.96 MPa under LS-3 (86 kN shear load in the X-direction). This value is lower than the material yield strength of ASTM A572 Grade 50 steel (345 MPa). Similarly, all other load cases — pin preload (49.287 MPa), shear in Y (209.420 MPa), manual locking force (125.930 MPa), and torsional moment (49.024 MPa) — produced stresses below the yield limit.

Therefore, under the applied loading assumptions, the lock pin assembly remains within the elastic region and is not expected to undergo yielding. The overall performance rating of 8.7 / 10 confirms that the selected lock pin assembly has adequate structural strength for the investigated loading conditions.

Recommended Action
Maintain the specified assembly preload, keep the 86 kN external load and 194 N·m torque as separate load cases in future assessments, and include the LS-3 governing location in routine inspection schedules.